Abdullahi Babalele, the son-in-law to a former Vice-President, Atiku Abubakar, was on Tuesday re-arraigned by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) before Justice C.J. Aneke, sitting at the Federal High Court, Lagos.
He however sought the permission of the Court for a foreign medical trip on the ground of his “life-threatening” illness.
Babalele tendered medical reports from three hospitals – two in Abuja and one in London – showing his health status.
OVER 5,000 NIGERIAN MEN HAVE OVERCOME POOR BEDROOM PERFORMANCE SYNDROME DUE TO THIS BRILLIANT DISCOVERY
The defendant is being prosecuted by the EFCC for allegedly laundering $140,000 in the build-up to the last general elections.
The EFCC charged him with the offence on August 14, 2019, before Justice Nicholas Oweibo before the case was transferred to Justice C.J. Aneke.
Babalele was re-arraigned before the new judge today, just as he pleaded not guilty.
Justice Aneke granted his prayer to continue on the N20m bail with one surety earlier granted him in August by Justice Oweibo.
But Babalele, through his counsel, Chief Mike Ozekhome SAN, applied for permission to travel abroad for treatment of his ailment.
Ozekhome told the judge that the application contained medical reports from Samiya Hospital and the National Hospital both in Abuja and another one from a Michael Warren, from a London hospital.
He also told the court that all the annexure to his application “points to great danger” if the defendant did not attend his medicals.
The lawyer prayed the court to grant the application and release his client’s passport to enable him travel.
But EFCC counsel, Rotimi Oyedepo, opposed him.
Oyedepo prayed the court to refuse the application and make an order for accelerated hearing of the charge.
Oyedepo contended that there was no invitation for Babalele to come abroad for treatment, as the one purportedly issued by Michael Warren bore a September 12, 2019 date, which had passed and “there is no appointment to be kept”.
He also argued that all the annexure tendered by the defendant did not suggest that what was diagnosed about the defendant’s ailment could not be treated in any Nigerian hospital.
Following the conclusion of arguments, Justice Aneke adjourned till October 11, for ruling on the application.